A crash course in changing the world.
The food council of Rome back in 1974 predicted imminent global mass shortage of food which subsequently technological advances in agriculture produced productivity gains that none could predict. We still had starvation but it wasn't from lack of food.
This year's Physics Nobel Prize winner, Willard Boyle, has the same dilemma. He finds the internet Plaghh!
The evidence introduced by 7000+ agents and growing is getting vast. Is it getting anymore manageable?
We all want to "save the world", or a little piece of it. Some of us want to win the game. There are a probably a few that even want to destroy the game and say I told you so at the end of it.
Perhaps we should all be making an effort to friend the agents producing evidence counter to our own?
It's great to feel safe by gathering around friends that believe in you and what you are doing but does it help you find the truth?
The Truth is out there but you only have a probability of less than one of finding it.
Comment
© 2024 Created by Alchemy. Powered by
You need to be a member of Urgent Evoke to add comments!
Join Urgent Evoke