Urgent Evoke

A crash course in changing the world.

Is the Capitalist system failing, (bound to fail)?

EDOARDO SIMONE PALUAN 03/11/09

Is the Capitalist system failing, (bound to fail)?


Capitalism and the social awareness of something which is becoming a myth.

“Capitalism
is an economic system in which a country’s trade and industry are controlled by
private owners for profit, rather than by the State”

******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************


I will start off this debate by posing a question to the class; do you believe you should get what you deserve? I believe the answer is really quite obvious, of
course. If you work for an hour, two hours, or three hours, you would expect to
be payed accordingly.

Coming back to the essence of the debate: ‘Is the Capitalist system failing the
majority (bound to fail)?’.
I believe that debating such a topic would be highly unfruitful, who am I to
say if Capitalism works or doesn’t work, who am I to say that a certain system
would be better than another one? Esteemed professors and PHD graduates have
not managed to find alternatives to every single flaw they found with
humanity’s ways to control its wealth, I will certainly not presume I can.

There is something upon which I can debate on, being an Italian, and I hope I
can contribute to this infinitely big debate in a very small manner, but at
least in a manner which doesn’t pretend to sway you all on my side of the
debate. What I hope to achieve in explaining my views is that you have missed
something very important, all of you, the ones arguing for the motion and those
arguing against the motion. As a beginning I would like to know from you when
was Capitalism first invented? Some may say it was in the 20th century,
some may say in 1776 when Adam Brooks wrote down the laws of the market, but in
my opinion Capitalism dates way back. In my opinion it dates back to the
Renaissance. Before the Renaissance, there were rich families, kings emperors
who used their money to make castles and to raise troops, so calling this
Capitalism in my opinion would not be correct. Capitalism is the acc**ulation
of capital. During the Renaissance many of the famous Italian families; The
Medici, the Sforza, the Estensi and dozens others, acc**ulated huge amounts of
money. To give you an idea of how glorious and prosperous Italy was you only
have to look at Venice, which had an annual income greater than that of Paris
and London put together. What I am trying to get to is that Capitalism was
already a living reality during that period of time. Yet, when I ask people in
which century would they live in if they were to travel in the past, they all
respond either in the Roman times, or in the Renaissance. How is this possible?
One was an Empire and the other was a system based on Capitalism, the same very
monster which millions of people are trying to flee from.
Is this diversity in opinion caused by a change which has occurred? Could the
Renaissance form of Capitalism have changed so much that now we only behold a
distorted system which is nothing comparable to its noble predecessor? I
believe so.



As a matter of fact I believe that this monster has taken such a powerful grip over us that we cannot even imagine a world free of its evil, because we believe it is a
power to do good. I am referring to money. What is money? Money is the way in
which everything we create or have can be given a rating according to its
value. It is a way to express something in a global currency involving numbers.
Thank God! It would be highly confusing to say I want a new cell-phone I will
pay you in a dozen bottles of deodorant, or I will buy those eggs from you by
giving you a pair of shoes. With money we manage to give the person we are
buying from something which they need, because money can be converted into
anything. In itself Money is a great invention. What we have made of it makes
it an abhor to human intelligence.


Money has become the centre, the focal point the only goal to which humanity aspires. Money is nowadays acc**ulated to what purpose? To make more money. We work , with
what goal? To gain more money. We invest, with what goal? To make more money.
We build horrid things which spoil the landscape and which are ruining the
lives of thousands, for what? To make more money. People everywhere are measuring their huge
deposits, millions and millions of dollars, just sitting there in a bank
acc**ulating over the course of the years.
Money has become a monster, a monster which is growing evermore and which
knows no end, because there is no limitation to the amount of money which you
can possess. You gain more money, you sack employees by the thousands when
money is needed, with the risk that these employees commit suicide. We see it
every day in the news, a society which glorifies money, to the detriment of the
human spirit. We have placed money above man in the ladder of importance. This
I believe is deeply immoral and socially wrong. We are placing something which
we ourselves created to help us, into something which is destroying us and is
suffocating us. I see around me bridges, roads, hotels, houses, I see around me
something disgusting, something which is a revulsion to the eye. If I go in
Piazza Duomo or in any of the major
Piazzas in Italy, I can see the grandeur of Capitalism, Churches, majestic
statues, buildings which make you feel proud of what you are and which elevate
the spirit. If I look at Capitalism now, I see a wh*** set of numbers,
sometimes green sometimes red, which don’t leave anything precious, anything
worth looking at for the future generations, save a set of green and red
numbers.


During the Renaissance mecenatism was at the order of the day, painters, sculptors and geniuses extinguished the huge stacks of money which the powerful families got
hold of, to the favour of a never
equalled proliferation of the Arts and of Culture. The human and his
intellect was placed in the centre of attention, the notion of what was
beautiful to the eye, and not what was beautiful to the purse was sovereign.
Nowadays anything we do has got an economical end to it. Name me one profession
nowadays which do not base themselves upon the continuous creation of money. It
is a mentality based upon the ever flourishing acc**ulation of money. Imagine
how many beautiful things could be made if instead of keeping towers of money
in banks which collapse every twenty years or so. I can sense it in you now,
the native human thought of creation an urge to spend and invest in something
which may not be profitable, but yet still worthwhile. We cannot believe that something may yet well
be worth investing in unless it has a profitable outcome. I ask you now, do you
think that Lorenzo De Medici had any restrictions on the amount of money he
dedicated to his army of painters, thinkers and sculptors? At that time there
was a real competition between rival families, a competition which led to the
creation of all things beautiful. Now we are in competition to own the greatest
number paper banknotes.

After this short debate in which I hope to have expanded the effects and the
drawbacks of any system which is economically based. I would like to finish off by coming back to
what I asked at the beginning of the
debate: do you believe you should get what you deserve? You all said yes, what I would like to know
is what have you done to deserve sitting here in a private school and getting
an education which other much more deserving children around the world deserve
far more? I believe that this should be enough o reflect upon



I will start this debate off by quoting a text which I directly found on the internet:

“Capitalism is the 20th century’s victorious economical and
political ideal, having proven that a Communist way of life is impossible. Capitalism
is a form of economic order characterized by private ownership of the means of
production and the freedom of private owners to use, buy and sell their
property or services on the market at voluntarily agreed prices and terms, with
only minimal interference with such transactions by the state or other
authoritative third parties. In the centre of this system there is an
everlasting notion of profit.


Communism on the other hand, is an ideology based on the communal ownership of all property and a classless social structure, with economic production and distribution to
be directed and
regulated by means of an authoritative economic plan that supposedly embodies the
interests of the community as a wh***.”



So far so good, you might say. If you do then you haven’t listened properly, or you have no knowledge whatsoever of the difference between an economical system
and a political one. As a matter of fact, in the definition of the word
CAPITALISM we are saying that it is a form of economic order. The definition of
the word COMMUNISM is as said an ideology based upon the communal ownership of
all property and a classless social structure. This would be the POLITICAL
system.
I have started this debate off like this because I would like you to recognize
that COMMUNISM is not an alternative to CAPITALISM, simply because it can’t be,
and all of you who believe it is, are comparing an economical system with a political
one, which is wrong, it would be like comparing salt to sugar, or black to
white, in short your non-recognition of the impossibility to compare COMMUNISM
to CAPITALISM would mean that you are ready to debate over something which is
not debatable.
In doing so, this debate is closed even before it has begun.

Lets focus our attention on the subject matter,


“The Capitalist system is failing the
majority of people”
Yet again we are faced with a very hard statement to prove correct. Why? Because we are all fairly rich and we are all
enjoying the benefits of Capitalism. I myself would have to disagree with this
statement if I were to analyse only my situation. Unfortunately for the opposite side the
debate is based upon what we think works


mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:EN-US;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA"">
You will ask me; what is your alternative? My alternative is a world free of
free trade. A world free of centenary titles and heritage, a world based upon
the adoration of the individual and his/her actions, not an adoration according
to lineage. A world like that would be Communist. I agree with you. But when I
hear you say that in a DEMOCRACY all have equal rights, and when I go to court
and have seen the statue holding a balance, with her eyes blinded by a
handkerchief, it is me who asks you, is it any different from Communism? Equal
people in front of the law, why can we not make equal people also based upon of
what they deserve? A starting point from which everyone starts at the same
level and gradually moves upwards based upon what they deserve. This in my
opinion would be the best form of policy to adopt. A sort of mutual cooperation
between the economical ideas of Communism and Capitalism. I stress the words:
economical and ideas. This is because I
do not agree that the Communist system joined with the Capitalist one is
capable of producing something good. Jus like I said before, it would be like
mixing a wh*** egg, including the albumen, and a wh*** lemon, including the skin,
in a bowl and pretend to get something edible. You just don’t. On the other
hand, if you take the yolk and mix it with lemon juice, you get
mayonnaise.


This is because I believe we have created two monsters. Basing the human
society upon something as base as money is immoral. The wh*** way of thinking
must be changed. Communism and Capitalism are the same thing. A way to get more
money from money. In the end, money is the engine of society, not the
individual, money is the centre of attention, not the individual. In my belief
we are creating system which will never be able to work because they are so
base and low in their morals. All Capitalist states have suffered from the
crisis. When there was no work to be done, the individual was sent home, and no
money was given making suicides and social unrest grow. Money has conditioned
our way of life, and since there is no limit as to how much money you can have,
for me having one euro or having a million is the same thing, morally both sums
of money amount to less than one. The wh*** system must change people must
start to think differently, or at least as they did during the Reanaissance.
Nowadays what are we leaving our kids? Bridges? Architecture? NO, we are leaving
them money, and fromthat money only more money will grow, nothing nice nothing
majestic, nothing which elevates the supreme nature of man, and that is the
desire of creation, the will to invent and the mentality to pursue what is
worth pursuing. We are living in
Pre-historic times, no intellect whatsoever just one God and that is: Money.

Views: 104

Comment by A.V.Koshy on April 10, 2010 at 4:29pm
capitalism is bound to fail and fail the majority as is every other system
only a mixed economy can serve the world now - half government and half private
Comment by Edoardo Simone Paluan on April 11, 2010 at 11:41am
Capitalism will not fail, but it will fail the human society, which in a sense means that it is useless, and therefore has already failed us before coming into be...
Comment by Samiran Roy on April 11, 2010 at 12:32pm
Any form of government will fail, if the rulers work only for their self interest....
If the rulers genuinely love the people, any form of government would work..
(I may be wrong on this)

Comment

You need to be a member of Urgent Evoke to add comments!

Join Urgent Evoke

Latest Activity

Meghan Mulvey posted a blog post

Fourth of July on the Lake

This past weekend was the annual celebration at the lake house in Connecticut. It is amazing that the lake is still so clear and beautiful after all these years. The watershed association has done a wonderful job protecting these waters from the damaging effects of development.The wood grill was finally ready to cook on, so we didn't miss the propane tank fueled grill anymore. The food actually tasted fresher than in the past and was easy to keep fueled.Dad was very proud of the solar hybrid…See More
Jul 6
Asger Jon Vistisen posted a blog post

Stinging Nettle

In this blog post I will focus on a plant that is abundant in our nature, and which is immensely nutritious. It's of course the Stinging Nettle. Let's start with the chemical constituents of this plant:37 % Non-Nitrogen-Extracts19 - 29 % Ash9 - 21 % Fiber4 % Fat22 % ProteinOnce the leaves are drid, their protein content can reach an astounding 40 %, which is much higher than beef, which even under the best of circ***tances can never exceed 31 % protein. In addition the Stinging Nettle consists…See More
Apr 13
Jonathon McCallum posted a blog post

The meal

It is 7'oclock, I was late home from work due to an assignment that i wanted to get ahead on. By the time I get home I am feeling extremley tired and I cannot be bothered to make a proper meal. I walk to the fridge and open it to see what there is for me to eat. All of the out of date foodstuffs have been automaticaly thrown away by the fridge, they will be recycled tomorrow as animal feed or something. I see i have organic local eggs and some local cheese. Foods are vacc** sealded for easy…See More
Mar 10
Jean Paul Galea shared a profile on Facebook
Mar 1
Kevin posted a blog post

Future

FutureToday is 2020/1/1. It is just like yesterday. The war is still continuing. It has started since 2010. In 2010, that year was a horrible year. Almost every energy ran out. Every country’s governments were crushed down at the same time. There were riots everywhere. All of the big company’s bosses were killed xdeadx in the riots. Troops fought each other everywhere. Food was bought up xawayx at once. There were no more food supplies in any shops. The economy was all crushed down. All the…See More
Jan 1
Namwaka Mooto posted blog posts
Jan 13, 2016
T D updated their profile
Sep 3, 2015
Brook Warner posted blog posts
Aug 25, 2015
Santiago Vega posted blog posts
May 5, 2015
Santiago Vega commented on Santiago Vega's blog post Act 8
May 5, 2015
Santiago Vega posted photos
May 5, 2015
Rico Angel Rodriguez posted blog posts
May 2, 2015
Rico Angel Rodriguez posted a photo

public servants

The exchange works directly for state and public workers and servants. It gives them credit in exchange for the amount of public work they contribute to the community. The more constructive they are based off a base rate the more credit they recieve.
May 2, 2015
Brian Hurley posted blog posts
May 2, 2015
Brian Hurley commented on Brian Hurley's blog post ACT: Future of Currency
May 2, 2015
Rico Angel Rodriguez posted a blog post

Where I will be in ten years.

Ten years from now I will be in a political job assisting with people in the midlands of South Carolina particularly the rural working class and farmers. As the class of people that feed the nation I find that it is imperative that we assist with making sure they produce as much food as possible. I would like to support local scientists as well that are leading in research on how to produce food more efficiently. I will also be participating in missions to foreign countries to help people with…See More
May 1, 2015

Follow EVOKE on Twitter




Official EVOKE Facebook Page




EVOKE RSS Activity Feed










© 2020   Created by Alchemy.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service