Urgent Evoke

A crash course in changing the world.

Land: A different concept which needs to be reconsidered.



During the end of the 16th and the beginning of the 17th centuries, European monarchs encouraged and subsidized expeditions to the New World. None were more active, nor made greater impact, than the English. In the name of their monarchs in the Tudor and the Stuart lines, the English established thriving colonies in North America.

Under English law, discoveries were made in the name of the sovereign and all lands belonged to the monarch, to be disposed of at the will of the crown. Joint stock companies received charters from the crown and parceled out land. Royal favorites also received territories to be parceled out as they saw fit. However, these lands that had been "discovered" and distributed by the English had been occupied for centuries by various Indian nations. In time, the Indians and the Europeans discovered that each had quite different ideas about land ownership—a cultural difference that had a profound effect on the history of the United States.

There were a great many Indian tribes in the Americas, and each understood itself to be a nation, with a different language and culture than all others. "Indian" is nothing more than a vague catch-all name (first used by Columbus, who mistakenly thought he had landed in India). Native Americans had their own names, their nations, and each name usually translated as, simply, "The People." However, although Indian cultures were quite varied, most shared a similar understanding of the meaning and the stewardship of land.

Long before the first European settlers came to America, Indians had developed an advanced economy. Indian tribes traded extensively with each other, and many had some form of money. None, however, had any institution like the "land title" of the Europeans. They had no tradition of "alienating", or relinquishing all rights, to land. Many thought that this showed Indian social development to be more primitive that that of the Europeans. But the Native Americans had developed sophisticated legal systems that incorporated treaties, elaborated rights and specified ways to resolve disputes.

A great many treasures of art and oral literature have been passed down from prehistory. Indian cultures and religions were enmeshed with nature, for they felt themselves entwined with the universe. Mother Earth and Father Sky were more than mere expressions; they represented the Indians' very being. Land, a part of the universe, belonged to all, particularly the tribe. Individual land ownership did not exist, since all were entitled to the fruits of nature. Users' rights were protected and specified in various traditions, but there was no such things as land "ownership". Generally, individuals could clear as much land as needed for farming; this land would remain in a family's possession as long as they continued to use it. Once it was abandoned, anyone else could cultivate it.

Indians readily understood and entered into treaties concerning rights to land use, but the idea of land sales was alien to them—and it is likely that, because of difficulties in translation of each others' languages, neither the natives nor the settlers understood this vital difference, at first.

When President Franklin Pierce offered to buy the lands of Chief Seattle's tribe, his response illustrated how abhorrent the idea of giving up land was to his people:

The great -- and good, I believe -- White Chief sends us word that he wants to buy land. But he will reserve us enough that we can live comfortably. This seems generous, since the red man no longer has rights he need respect....
So your offer seems fair, and I think my people will accept it and go to the reservation you offer them. We will live apart, and in peace.... It matters little where we pass the rest of our days. They are not many. The Indians' night will be dark. No bright star shines on his horizons. The wind is sad. Fate hunts the red man down. Wherever he goes, he will hear the approaching steps of his destroyer, and prepare to die, like the wounded doe who hears the step of the hunter....
We will consider your offer. When we have decided, we will let you know. Should we accept, I here and now make this condition: we will never be denied to visit, at any time, the graves of our fathers and our friends.
Every part of this earth is sacred to my people. Every hillside, every valley, every clearing and wood, is holy in the memory and experience of my people. Even those unspeaking stones along the shore are loud with events and memories in the life of my people. The ground beneath your feet responds more lovingly to our steps than yours, because it is the ashes of our grandfathers. Our bare feet know the kindred touch. The earth is rich with the lives of our kin.

In his speech, Seattle accepts the inevitability of the plans of "the Great White Chief". But, nevertheless, he asserts his people's moral right to walk on the land whenever they wish, forever. This, of course, is not compatible with the Europeans' concept of "private property" in land.

Inevitably, as settlements grew and the desire for further expansion increased, the cultures of these Native Americans and of Europeans came into conflict. Treaty after treaty relocated the Indians, moving them farther west and robbing them of their habitat. Corrupt and devious means were used to compel them to forfeit their lands. In many cases, the Indians had little idea of what the settlers meant in denying them access to their lands. Lacking the technology and weapons of the Europeans, the Indians were eventually relocated and forced to subsist in a total area of only 200,000 square miles, in a continent of over six million square miles which they had once wholly occupied.


http://www.landandfreedom.org/ushistory/us1.htm


Views: 37

Comment by Iron Helix on May 4, 2010 at 6:04pm
Quote: A great many treasures of art and oral literature have been passed down from prehistory. Indian cultures and religions were enmeshed with nature, for they felt themselves entwined with the universe. Mother Earth and Father Sky were more than mere expressions; they represented the Indians' very being. Land, a part of the universe, belonged to all, particularly the tribe. Individual land ownership did not exist, since all were entitled to the fruits of nature. Users' rights were protected and specified in various traditions, but there was no such things as land "ownership". Generally, individuals could clear as much land as needed for farming; this land would remain in a family's possession as long as they continued to use it. Once it was abandoned, anyone else could cultivate it.

This has long been contested as a myth.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ownership#Native_American_View
http://www.perc.org/articles/article651.php
http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/property-rights-among-nati...

Land ownership was simply an evolutionary aspect of increased social density. One phrase in particular captures this sentiment:

Farther from the rivers, however, where the value of land for crops was low, it was not worth establishing ownership. As one historian put it, no one would consider laying out a garden in the rocky hinterlands.


The question of land ownership was inapplicable if owning the land had no purpose. With increasing social density, however, land demarcation was a given. The American civilizations of the Maya, Aztec, and Inca had land ownership. Particularly in the case of the Maya, there was clear hierarchy of society as applied to land. Peasantry was an integral part of the intensiveness of Mayan agriculture, and the process of it's decline has been well examined by anthropologists.
Comment by Catherine Gentry on May 4, 2010 at 6:49pm
Yes, I was generally aware of such an idea. Perhaps it is more the idea of stewardship with must be embraced, although there is definitely a lot of non-sense related to land ownership on our planet. I've not read (or put my hands on a copy of) this resource yet but much of my research, the past few years would seem to confirm the conclusions: most land on our planet is still owned by the various monarchies and the Catholic Church. Everyone else are merely tenants. See Who Owns the World: The Surprising Truth About Every Piece of Land on the Planet by Kevin Cahill.

I'm also aware of how the beginnings of patriarchy as are expressed in the The Old Testament which became the basis for Western religious, philosophical underpinnings includes giving man "dominion" over nature. This dominion concept I believe, was the basis for our environmental nightmare. I am very aware that ideas have consequences as they shape the ways in which we interact with our world.

To change the world, we need to change these ideas and there are plenty of reasons to do so.
Comment by Sarah O.Connor Panamericana on May 4, 2010 at 6:54pm
Check the Mondragon cooperatives approach, you might love it, land-trusts, etc
Comment by A.V.Koshy on May 4, 2010 at 7:22pm
i like the idea of patriarchy, dominion over nature and of the catholic church owning a lot of the land on earth :)
Comment by Catherine Gentry on May 4, 2010 at 7:56pm
Sarah, I'll do it. Thanks. I'm aware of the land trust idea, as I was working in a nonprofit years ago creating one. I've some ideas related to this which perhaps will fit into the next mission. These ideas were formulated after seeing the doc**entary: "Whale Dreamer's which Julian Lennon produced. I tried to find it online to share but found only information about the video and not the movie itself: http://www.whaledreamers.com/html/

What if we could forge partnerships with indigenous people, as those in the video, who are more in-tune with their right brain--hooking them up with Western scientist...using technology along the lines of Janine Benyus' Biomimicry: http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/janine_benyus_biomimicry_in_actio...

This way the native peoples' sensitivity with the subtle energies of the earth (more in touch with the right brain) can work with the scientists (more in-tune with the left brain) in being sure that new technologies are literally earth friendly--and thus we stop polluting and destroying our environment. This works toward once again rebalancing our environment. Land trusts could be used to encompass large tracts of land for the people willing to return to more sustainable ways of interacting with the earth, (and learning from the Catholic Churches bulls) the land is in the public trusts INTO PERPETUITY. Pretty cool concept I believe.

Comment

You need to be a member of Urgent Evoke to add comments!

Join Urgent Evoke

Latest Activity

Ning Admin is now a member of Urgent Evoke
May 17, 2023
N updated their profile
Sep 25, 2020
Sophie C. commented on Asger Jon Vistisen's blog post Stinging Nettle
"I love that you've brought this to attention. An extensive database of uncommon but resistant and hardy plants/foods could be developed and organized by climate. Ease of growth and processing should also be taken in to account. I will try to…"
Aug 19, 2020
Meghan Mulvey posted a blog post

Fourth of July on the Lake

This past weekend was the annual celebration at the lake house in Connecticut. It is amazing that the lake is still so clear and beautiful after all these years. The watershed association has done a wonderful job protecting these waters from the damaging effects of development.The wood grill was finally ready to cook on, so we didn't miss the propane tank fueled grill anymore. The food actually tasted fresher than in the past and was easy to keep fueled.Dad was very proud of the solar hybrid…See More
Jul 6, 2020
Asger Jon Vistisen posted a blog post

Stinging Nettle

In this blog post I will focus on a plant that is abundant in our nature, and which is immensely nutritious. It's of course the Stinging Nettle. Let's start with the chemical constituents of this plant:37 % Non-Nitrogen-Extracts19 - 29 % Ash9 - 21 % Fiber4 % Fat22 % ProteinOnce the leaves are drid, their protein content can reach an astounding 40 %, which is much higher than beef, which even under the best of circ**stances can never exceed 31 % protein. In addition the Stinging Nettle consists…See More
Apr 13, 2020
Jonathon McCallum posted a blog post

The meal

It is 7'oclock, I was late home from work due to an assignment that i wanted to get ahead on. By the time I get home I am feeling extremley tired and I cannot be bothered to make a proper meal. I walk to the fridge and open it to see what there is for me to eat. All of the out of date foodstuffs have been automaticaly thrown away by the fridge, they will be recycled tomorrow as animal feed or something. I see i have organic local eggs and some local cheese. Foods are vacc** sealded for easy…See More
Mar 10, 2020
Jean Paul Galea shared a profile on Facebook
Mar 1, 2020
Kevin posted a blog post

Future

FutureToday is 2020/1/1. It is just like yesterday. The war is still continuing. It has started since 2010. In 2010, that year was a horrible year. Almost every energy ran out. Every country’s governments were crushed down at the same time. There were riots everywhere. All of the big company’s bosses were killed xdeadx in the riots. Troops fought each other everywhere. Food was bought up xawayx at once. There were no more food supplies in any shops. The economy was all crushed down. All the…See More
Jan 1, 2020
Namwaka Mooto posted blog posts
Jan 13, 2016
T D updated their profile
Sep 3, 2015
Brook Warner posted blog posts
Aug 25, 2015
Santiago Vega posted blog posts
May 5, 2015
Santiago Vega commented on Santiago Vega's blog post Act 8
May 5, 2015
Santiago Vega posted photos
May 5, 2015
Rico Angel Rodriguez posted blog posts
May 2, 2015
Rico Angel Rodriguez posted a photo

public servants

The exchange works directly for state and public workers and servants. It gives them credit in exchange for the amount of public work they contribute to the community. The more constructive they are based off a base rate the more credit they recieve.
May 2, 2015

Follow EVOKE on Twitter




Official EVOKE Facebook Page




EVOKE RSS Activity Feed










© 2024   Created by Alchemy.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service