I chose Guy Kawasaki as a shadow hero. I have heard his name before and read some of his posts. He has a simplistic style that clarifies issues. Clarity is needed in when there are conflicting views about an issue. For example, climate change. You can put facts and stats on both sides of the issue and create a quagmire where action sleeps. Or you can focus on what I call the forward_path. The forward_path is simply a question. What impact will my next step forward have? This can lead to debates as well but the point is to step forward and test it. Take recycling you could argue there is a lot of waste in the recycling process and debate the real costs and do nothing. Or you could just step forward and try it. What is your forward_path?
You need to be a member of Urgent Evoke to add comments!
Join Urgent Evoke