"I love that you've brought this to attention. An extensive database of uncommon but resistant and hardy plants/foods could be developed and organized by climate. Ease of growth and processing should also be taken in to account. I will try to…"
A crash course in changing the world.
Design to the Rescue
Hi all
I recently had the opportunity to sit down with Niels LaWhite, chief scientist for Second Wind and ask him a few questions about Wind Energy. I was hoping that he would give me some guidance with my project, instead he opened my eyes to the current wind energy situation in America and how I can help.
One thing that Niels told me which I found very interesting is that the Wind turbines that we use today are based on Danish designs. When the American's first started building turbines they believed they had a HUGE advantage because at the time America was the world leader in helicopter technology--it was far from the truth. The mechanics that go into making a helicopter work are all controllable forces. The blades spin and generate a controllable amount of lift. Well wind is as chaotic and turbulent a force as they come. So when you try an use tight gear boxes and finely tuned gear ratios that work at say 25mph winds, what happens when their is a gust of 40mphs? The turbine breaks!
The Danish on the other hand had a completely different approach. They had a government policy that helped inventors and engineers who were interested in wind tech get started. The government provided technical schematics and aid as a starting point. Then when these inventors modified the design, before they could release the product and make money, the government would take the turbine and test it and work with the inventor to improve the design. You see the Danish government didn't want any turbines to reflect poorly upon the country that made them. Smart huh?
I made this to explain the rest of the technical side of our discussion.
Wind turbines can be very cost effective energy generating machines as long as the due diligence was done up front. Niels said that his general rule is, "if you like where you live, it would be a bad place for a turbine." 20mph winds have enough power to open a car door, so sorry to everyone who thinks that they are going to save the world by putting up a turbine on your house (me including).
So how does design come to save the day? I'll tell you. As a designer it is my job to inform people in clear and visually interesting ways. I believe that if people understood a bit more about what goes into make a
turbine effective they would see them as a real energy source and not some backyard bs. So I am going to make a poster series and maybe a flash movie or two that inform and inspire.
What do you all think? Any ideas?
I recently had the opportunity to sit down with Niels LaWhite, chief scientist for Second Wind and ask him a few questions about Wind Energy. I was hoping that he would give me some guidance with my project, instead he opened my eyes to the current wind energy situation in America and how I can help.
One thing that Niels told me which I found very interesting is that the Wind turbines that we use today are based on Danish designs. When the American's first started building turbines they believed they had a HUGE advantage because at the time America was the world leader in helicopter technology--it was far from the truth. The mechanics that go into making a helicopter work are all controllable forces. The blades spin and generate a controllable amount of lift. Well wind is as chaotic and turbulent a force as they come. So when you try an use tight gear boxes and finely tuned gear ratios that work at say 25mph winds, what happens when their is a gust of 40mphs? The turbine breaks!
The Danish on the other hand had a completely different approach. They had a government policy that helped inventors and engineers who were interested in wind tech get started. The government provided technical schematics and aid as a starting point. Then when these inventors modified the design, before they could release the product and make money, the government would take the turbine and test it and work with the inventor to improve the design. You see the Danish government didn't want any turbines to reflect poorly upon the country that made them. Smart huh?
I made this to explain the rest of the technical side of our discussion.
Wind turbines can be very cost effective energy generating machines as long as the due diligence was done up front. Niels said that his general rule is, "if you like where you live, it would be a bad place for a turbine." 20mph winds have enough power to open a car door, so sorry to everyone who thinks that they are going to save the world by putting up a turbine on your house (me including).
So how does design come to save the day? I'll tell you. As a designer it is my job to inform people in clear and visually interesting ways. I believe that if people understood a bit more about what goes into make a
turbine effective they would see them as a real energy source and not some backyard bs. So I am going to make a poster series and maybe a flash movie or two that inform and inspire.
What do you all think? Any ideas?
Views: 65
-
Comment by Turil Cronburg on April 3, 2010 at 3:45am
-
Hey, I walk by their office/s all the time in Somerville. I always wondered what they did, as it didn't seem like they actually put up windmills.
It seems that smaller windmills are find for smaller purposes, and lesser winds. So maybe powering your laptop is still feasible, at least sometimes, with wind power.
-
-
Oh, also, there's small typo in the illustration text. You've got "Exachange" at the bottom of the left column.
-
Comment by Wintermute on April 3, 2010 at 3:59am
-
I can buy a unit that charges my laptop, yes it would be fun to build one and I still might do it, but if I really want to help make the world a better place I need to use my talents.
thanks for the typo spot.
-
Comment by Nick Heyming on April 3, 2010 at 4:31am
-
Does everything he was saying apply to Vertical Axis Wind Turbines or multi rotor wind as well?
-
Comment by Nathaniel Fruchter on April 3, 2010 at 4:33am
-
An awesome infographic!
A question: personally, I've never seen anyone who doesn't really see wind power as a true source of energy, at least in the "augment, not replace" sense. Who exactly would you be targeting?
-
Comment by Michele Baron on April 3, 2010 at 4:34am
-
Very interesting--diffused feeds are more effective. Thank you for your post.
-
Comment by Sarah Shaw Tatoun on April 3, 2010 at 4:37am
-
"As a designer it is my job to inform people in clear and visually interesting ways." Then I'd say you're doing an amazing job-- that's a gorgeous graphic -- and very clear.
What I'm not clear on, however, is why, if it is really not cost-effective, there are huge windmills all over Copenhagen. It's true there's usually a wind, but it doesn't seem excessive to me. Is it because they ARE big that it becomes worthwhile? Are the 'home wind-turbines' not cost-effective because they are small?
Extremely impressed, as always, with your work, Wintermute. By the way, I've put you in my latest 'vision'. ;-)
-
-
@Nick--something yes, others...i don't know. The graph that shows the air being slowed down is Betz Law, which states a maximum efficiency of 59.29%. the multirotors look interesting but according to betz law you'd be better off having 5 single rotors the 5 rotors in a line, but I think their graphs say other wise, ill have to look into it.
@nathaniel--along route 93 in boston (for those who live in the area) is a a wind turbine, according to Niels the diligence studies weren't done to determine if the site was economical, as it turns out it isn't. So now after paying all this money to put it there--and getting people hopes up--it turns out that it doesn't generate barely any power, and its going to break soon. The effect this has on morale is crippling, when people hear stories like that they loose faith in wind and start to see it as a publicity stunt.
For any graphic design work target audience is a very important question I hadn't exactly tacked that down Nathaniel but now I better get on it since your curious.
@ Sarah -- I think I know the answer but I am going to shoot Niels an email with your questions (your too Nick) and get a proper answer. My guess is that the cost effective equation is something like
[(average potential Wind energy generated in watts over a 5 year period*cost of electricity per watt) -- (cost of installation+maintenance over 5 years)] if that equation is positive then it will be worth it. but like I said that's just a guess. Thank you for the honor of being put in your vision post, I will have to go check it out.
-
-
yeah those solar wind panels are amazing. I went back last night and read that wh*** site that nick posted about multi rotor turbines, and they look pretty incredible. I think that if their data is correct there could be a lot of personal wind turbines that could cost effective.
-
Comment by sunnydupree on April 3, 2010 at 5:50pm
-
Very good work and investigative powers. My eyes were open as I see the type of wind power mills all down the highway where I travel. I look forward to seeing your production. I think that you show foresight and creativity in your blog regarding Wind Power. I look forward to seeing what else you have in store for us!
Latest Activity
Fourth of July on the Lake
This past weekend was the annual celebration at the lake house in Connecticut. It is amazing that the lake is still so clear and beautiful after all these years. The watershed association has done a wonderful job protecting these waters from the damaging effects of development.The wood grill was finally ready to cook on, so we didn't miss the propane tank fueled grill anymore. The food actually tasted fresher than in the past and was easy to keep fueled.Dad was very proud of the solar hybrid…See More
Stinging Nettle
In this blog post I will focus on a plant that is abundant in our nature, and which is immensely nutritious. It's of course the Stinging Nettle. Let's start with the chemical constituents of this plant:37 % Non-Nitrogen-Extracts19 - 29 % Ash9 - 21 % Fiber4 % Fat22 % ProteinOnce the leaves are drid, their protein content can reach an astounding 40 %, which is much higher than beef, which even under the best of circ**stances can never exceed 31 % protein. In addition the Stinging Nettle consists…See More
The meal
It is 7'oclock, I was late home from work due to an assignment that i wanted to get ahead on. By the time I get home I am feeling extremley tired and I cannot be bothered to make a proper meal. I walk to the fridge and open it to see what there is for me to eat. All of the out of date foodstuffs have been automaticaly thrown away by the fridge, they will be recycled tomorrow as animal feed or something. I see i have organic local eggs and some local cheese. Foods are vacc** sealded for easy…See More
Future
FutureToday is 2020/1/1. It is just like yesterday. The war is still continuing. It has started since 2010. In 2010, that year was a horrible year. Almost every energy ran out. Every country’s governments were crushed down at the same time. There were riots everywhere. All of the big company’s bosses were killed xdeadx in the riots. Troops fought each other everywhere. Food was bought up xawayx at once. There were no more food supplies in any shops. The economy was all crushed down. All the…See More
public servants
The exchange works directly for state and public workers and servants. It gives them credit in exchange for the amount of public work they contribute to the community. The more constructive they are based off a base rate the more credit they recieve.
© 2024 Created by Alchemy.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Urgent Evoke to add comments!
Join Urgent Evoke