There are... 600 or so posts tagged learn1, and 500 of act1+imagine1.
If we can get 50 people together, we can make a hierarchal peer review curation process.
What do I mean?
Everyone who participates will receive a list of URIs to posts. They'll be chosen randomly. (technically, it should be double-blind... but I'm not sure I want to code in that kind of interface. Please respond if you think it's worthwhile.)
Everyone will nominate 0-3 of their posts that they reviewed for promotion up to the next "sorting rank" and 0-1 posts for the "wall of public shame."
We'll then repeat the process until we're left with 20-30 very high quality posts, intended to represent the "Best of EVOKE's Mission 1." Which will then be presented to the mods so that the people can be adequately rewarded and featured. The people on the wall of shame will receive a similar treatment, so that we can provide /some/ negative reinforcement.