Listen
Let's face it; an imponderably large amount of us, sitting on our comfy chairs, in front of our fancy laptop computers, relatively well-clothed and certainly well fed [many of us too well fed, might I add] have no idea what it's like to be hungry, I mean we call 'hunger' that feeling that we get when it's past four in the afternoon and we haven't eaten more than a few pieces of toast, a mug of coffee and some scrambled eggs. We don't know what it's like to live on the streets, and no, before you ask, that time you were too drunk to get home and got a few hours of sleep in a public bus or in a park doesn't really count either. We have no clue what it feels like to be a child soldier, or to be taken as a political prisoner [although some of us here in Latin America, amongst other places, grew up with first-hand stories about things too horrible to forget]. Most of us have probably never even drunk a glass of dirty water; lots of people do.
When confronted with such circ**stances it's easy to think that you have all the answers: "Someone's hungry? come on, how hard can it be! just give the guy some food! What? Thirsty? Okay, let's give them a couple thousand gallons of water, it's not like water's that expensive! Cold? Here, have some blankets. Don't know how to grow food? there you go, have an old book that I photocopied. Of course, if problems were easy to solve, they wouldn't really be problems, don't you think?
And of course it sounds silly when I say it, I'm being pretty sarcastic, don't you think? fact is, everyone from the most powerful government in the planet to random people on the tube to my girlfriend's second cousin's father is taking this approach: why? because it sounds like such a good idea! The US gives away loads of free food each year: there's a program called Food for Peace which basically gives away food to people who really need it; poor people, kids, pregnant ladies, etcetera.
Ooo, look at those evil americans, giving food to hungry people, how evil is that! the horror!
Okay, no, I'm not saying it's evil: I'm simply saying it's shortsighted: solutions need to be stable, and we all hear that old saying, you know which one, about giving people fish or teaching them how to get it. It doesn't take an ivy league economist to tell you that if you dump into a country half it's gross domestic product in corn, it's gonna have all kinds of bad consequences. First of all, you quickly turn farmers into unemployed people, since food prices drop dramatically, and poverty plus unemployment equals what? that's right! more crime and hunger, violence and corruption in the long run.
Problems are not only terrible, they're also complicated. This is people we're talking about, and one individual person is more complicated that any machine ever made by anyone. Just imagine what kind of intricacies upon intricacies emerge when you put people together. Human groups are incredibly complicated, and this means that no simple solution is going to make it all right.
We don't know what hunger, homelessness, child draft, torture, extreme poverty, water shortages or illiteracy are like, and it doesn't make any sense to assume we do. It's actually harmful if we get it wrong, which is the tricky thing: However, there's people who know what hunger is like: hungry people. No solution that doesn't take into account the voice of the people we want to help is going to accomplish anything. Knowing is half the battle, and much knowledge lies with the people.
You need to be a member of Urgent Evoke to add comments!
Join Urgent Evoke