I'm gonna touch the issue that is the elephant in the room
of the mission now: Cities are inherently not resilient,
they are in themselves one of the best analogies for centralization, consumption condensation and unbalance.
If you live in a city and the main water supply fails, or the power
goes down, or there is a food shortage, you are done,
there is no adaptation to disruption, there is just no power, no water,
sending the techs to fix the supply or the power station
is not resilience, that's maintenance of a non resilient system.
Regarding the food security issue a city is as not resilient as it gets,
all the food is grown outside of the city. The only solution to this that
I know of is indoor horticulture, roof tops wont suffice, I'm not aware
of one city that is considering the promotion of indoor horticulture
in a urban environment.
Resilience can be seen as a system's structural property
rather than as a contingency plan for a disaster,
its about the disruption tolerance of the system
and not about rebuilding whatever was there
when the disaster takes it down.
That said, I can tell you that there is no real
resilience plan for Buenos Aires,
yet.
You need to be a member of Urgent Evoke to add comments!
Join Urgent Evoke